By Peter Spence, VP of Sales & Partnerships, AuditSoft
Peter has 10+ years of experience in the regulatory technology and safety & compliance industry. He was involved in the early rollout of the Certificate Of Recognition (COR) program in Ontario and has completed the IHSA COR Internal Auditor and the Basic Auditing Principles courses. Prior to AuditSoft, Peter worked for the leading provider of global legal and regulatory compliance content, consulting Fortune 500 companies and supporting their rollout of global corporate compliance and auditing programs. Connect with Peter on LinkedIn.
Over the past several months, I’ve been in dozens of meetings with hiring clients across construction, energy, infrastructure, and public works. A consistent theme is emerging: a growing realization that contractor prequalification needs to be more than just a checkbox activity. Many organizations are acknowledging that they’ve been operating under a false sense of confidence—believing that contractor risk is being managed through procurement workflows or legal contract language.
But when the conversation deepens, it’s clear that responsibilities around contractor compliance and safety performance are often dotted lines—spread across departments without clear ownership. As we’ve seen in cases like R. v. Greater Sudbury, this ambiguity can create real legal and reputational risk.
The truth is: contractor prequalification cannot be treated as a one-time task. It’s not enough to collect certificates or check boxes on a form. Verification and ongoing monitoring are essential to having a defensible contractor management program. Without it, hiring clients are exposed—both morally and legally—if something goes wrong.
Another concern I frequently hear is whether requiring prequalification creates a barrier to entry—similar to how some used to argue that requiring COR or ISO certification was anti-competitive. But let’s unpack that.
The reality is that contractor prequalification is not an expensive, months-long certification process. In fact, compared to ISO or COR, it’s far more accessible, flexible, and scalable. More importantly, when implemented properly, it’s not about exclusion—it’s about consistency and fairness.
If you apply the same set of safety, insurance, and capability standards to everyone—regardless of their size or past relationships—you actually level the playing field. Prequalification creates a more transparent, objective, and equitable way to assess all contractors before they step foot on your site.
At the end of the day, this isn’t just about compliance or cost-efficiency—it’s about protecting lives. Workers, supervisors, and subcontractors deserve to know that everyone on a job site has met the same minimum safety and operational standards. That their coworkers have submitted the right documentation. That they’re insured. That they’re qualified.
If you take anything away from my recent research and conversations, let it be this: contractor prequalification, when done right, improves safety and fairness—and it doesn’t have to break the bank.
Let’s move beyond the checkbox mentality. Let’s build smarter, safer, and more accountable workplaces, together.
ContractorXchange is AuditSoft’s prequalification and contractor management software. Developed with over 20 years of Canadian health and safety auditing expertise, ContractorXchange enables hiring clients and contractors to connect and collaborate through a trusted, verified network. Tune into our webinar to learn more.
The leading safety and compliance auditing and data analytics software.